4.0 Settlement
Pattern Character, Buildings & Spaces
Speen has developed into four general zones
which include the old part of the village, the
A4 Bath Road corridor, Speen Lane to the east
of the old railway cutting with its side roads
and the new developments to the north of the
A4. The latter two zones have mainly been developed
in the last 50 years.
The character of a village is defined not just
by the buildings, walls and trees but also the
spaces and views between them as these contribute
to the setting of the buildings.
The old part of the village is centred on the
western ends of Speen Lane and developments
on the north and south of the A4 Bath Road and
is largely within the Conservation Area. The
Ordnance Survey map of 1880 clearly shows that
this was the total village at that time. Although
Speen has undergone considerable residential
expansion in recent years, the old part of the
village and Conservation Area retain a sense
of significant historical and architectural
quality.
The aerial photograph of the village on the
centre pages illustrates, among other things,
the boundaries of the village and the Conservation
Area Open spaces and important views into, out
of and within the village are also identified.
Old Farmhouse and
Granary
Most of the public buildings and all of the
18 Listed Buildings (buildings identified by
English Heritage as being of special architectural
or historic interest).are in the old part of
the village. Some of these have been referred
to elsewhere but include the Church, Post Office,
Parish Hall and one Public House/Hotel. The
Parish Hall was constructed in 1886 and is a
classic Victorian red brick building with high
roof and a tower and is very well used today.
The Hare and Hounds Public House with its hipped
old tile roof was built in 1756 but there are
records of an “Ale House” being
on the site before this. The post office is
shown on the 1880 Ordnance Survey map and is
a low two storey building which currently has
the brickwork painted.
Many of the old building names and certain
road names have links back into the history
of the village from the 18th century.
Houses in the Old
Part of Speen
In the old part of the village two storey houses
of Georgian and Victorian construction are common
along with several post-war residential properties.
The prominent external building materials include
orange/red bricks, laid in Flemish bond with
salt glazed grays used as headers. Render and
lime wash finish are also common. Roofs are
generally tiled using handmade clay tiles, but
there are also many of slate. There are many
examples of English and Flemish bond boundary
walling, some with flint inset patterns. A feature
of the buildings in this part of the village
is that they are generally placed close to the
roads with associated gardens to the rear. This
gives a feeling of enclosure, particularly in
Speen Lane. Within some of these old walls are
some very attractive gates or doorways that
add a certain charm or secrecy to the enclosure.
The groups of houses on either side of the A4
Bath Road including those in Cromwell Terrace
and Essex Place with their irregular placement
and individual styles are also a key feature.
The more recent buildings in the old part of
the village have been low density redevelopments
of older properties or small new developments
such as in Kimbers Drive or the serviced properties
for senior citizens in Marshalls Court. The
latter is an excellent example of fitting the
new in with the old.
Houses in Old Part
of Village
|
|

Richmond House
The eastern end of Speen Lane was developed
over about a 20 year period from the 1960’s
into predominantly detached family homes. It
comprises a single line development of individualistic
houses to the south of the road and some infill
across to the Bath Road to the north in the
grounds of former large properties. Here the
two replacement developments offer a range of
detached and terraced houses in popular ‘Georgian’
style with bay windows and small panes. The
houses on the north side of the Lane have a
greater variety of styles and have larger gardens.
The houses are set further back from the road
than at the west end of Speen Lane giving a
feeling of openness. The single line development
to the south offers some fine views out to the
Kennet Valley beyond.
Development on both sides of the A4 presents
a mainly built-up, hard frontage close to the
back edge of the footway. Where buildings are
set back, hard boundary treatments, such as
fences, railings or walls, define the road edge.
The developments to the north of the A4 Bath
Road between Brummell Road and the recreation
ground were again built in the 1960’ and
1970’s. These dwellings form an area of
higher density with a mixture of detached, semi-detached
and terraced houses and a group of 80 flats
in 5 blocks. The majority of the houses in this
area are part of a larger estate that is divided
in two by Brummell Road. All to the west are
in Speen and to the east are in Newbury. With
the higher density development, gardens are
smaller and little land has been left for open
spaces, landscaping or communal planted tree
areas. Buildings are set back along uniform
building lines with pavements and some grass
verges within the highway. Open plan or low
enclosed front gardens are the norm and there
are a good variety of street trees in Brummell
Road, particularly the flowering cherries.
Some smaller cul-de-sac developments have taken
place in various parts of the village the most
prominent of these being The Sydings, Winterton
Drive and Caunter Road (which were all built
on the disused Newbury to Lambourn railway line),
Manor Place and Kimbers Drive. With the exception
of Caunter Road these developments are all modern,
predominantly detached, family houses. The Sydings
and Winterton Drive houses are brick built with
some wooden beam features and steep clay tiled
roofs. Both developments are well screened by
trees or high hedges. Kimbers Drive houses are
brick built open fronted with partial panel
wood facades and steep tiled roofs. The houses
in Manor Place are all detached in the Georgian
style and are more similar to the developments
at the east end of Speen Lane.
Caunter Road has a mixture of town houses,
and individual dwellings generally built to
a common style of red brick with some painted
rendered finish and grey slate effect roofing.
The development includes small bungalows.
Small developments of houses built by the Local
Authority after the Second World War also feature
in Speen. The main groups are those in Majendie
Close and on the Lambourn Road. The houses are
traditional red brick with high clay tiled roofs.
These houses fit well into their surroundings.
Cedar Tree in Speen
Hill Close
One of the important features of Speen is the
retention of hedges and trees. This is particularly
so in the older part of the village and all
the way down Speen Lane and the Old Bath Road
but is also a feature in the newer, smaller
developments mentioned above. There are some
excellent individual specimen trees, many of
which have preservation orders on them. These
include wellingtonia, pine, cypress, yew and
oak. There are considerable numbers of evergreens
within the village, especially in the older
gardens and these give character, particularly
in the winter months when they tend to dominate.
Stable Cottage |
4.1 Planning Guidance
Due to the variety of housing and development
styles in different areas of Speen some of the
following guidelines are area specific.
General
| PG
6. |
|
Buildings
on infill plots should be of individual
design, and should be designed to be well
integrated to reflect the landscape character
of the area |
| |
|
|
| PG 7. |
|
Any future development
should be designed to conserve and where
possible enhance the character of the village
such as its rural nature, quality, diversity
and heritage |
| |
|
|
| PG 8. |
|
Existing mature
tree belts and hedgerows which mark the
edge of the existing village should be retained
and, where appropriate, reinforced to preserve
the setting of the existing village |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Layout |
| |
|
|
| PG 9. |
|
Any new development
should take into account the scale, siting
and layout of its surroundings. |
| |
|
|
| PG 10. |
|
The siting of
new buildings should be examined from all
directions. Developers should provide perspective
(isometric) drawings or artists impressions
to show how new developments, extensions
and conversions would appear in relation
to their overall surroundings and adjacent
properties. |
| |
|
|
| PG 11 |
|
Any redevelopment
along the western ends of Speen Lane and
the Bath Road should reflect the linear
frontage form of development, and new buildings
should be sited close to the road frontage
to maintain the sense of enclosure. |
| |
|
|
| PG 12. |
|
Developments
to the southern side of Speen Lane should
retain the predominantly single frontage
form of development. |
| |
|
|
| PG 13. |
|
Any redevelopment
along the A4 should be designed to provide
an attractive frontage to that road and
should not present a harsh, impenetrable
visual or physical barrier. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Buildings |
| |
|
|
| PG 14. |
|
Developers should
respect and enhance the architectural quality
and variety in the street scene. |
| |
|
|
| PG 15. |
|
Where practicable
re-use of larger detached properties set
in spacious grounds should be sought as
an alternative to demolition and re-development
in order to preserve the visual character
and landscape setting of such properties
and their surroundings. This could apply
to conversion to both residential and commercial
use. |
|
|
| PG
16. |
|
Extensions
and alterations, as well as new buildings,
should use materials and be of a design
compatible with original and adjacent buildings
|
| |
|
|
| PG 17. |
|
New buildings
in the older part of the village should
be domestic in scale, one and a half to
two storeys in height, of brick construction
and appropriately detailed. Roofs should
be steeply pitched and generally covered
in plain clay tiles. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Views and Spaces |
| |
|
|
| PG 18. |
|
The open spaces
within the village and views into and out
of the village (see map) are essential parts
of the character of the village. Any new
developments (including infill or extensions)
should conserve and, where possible, enhance
these elements |
| |
|
|
| PG 19. |
|
Infill developments
and extensions to existing buildings should
take into account gaps that provide views
to surrounding countryside or open spaces
within the village. |
| |
|
|
| PG 20. |
|
Any conversion
of existing buildings for commercial use
should be undertaken sympathetically and
in a way that reflects the local character
of the village. |
| |
|
|
| PG 21 |
|
Open spaces,
including garden areas that have the potential
to encourage a variety of wildlife should,
where practicable, be positively managed
to provide appropriate habitats |
| |
|
|
| PG 22. |
|
Any development
in the estate area north of the Bath Road
and west of Brummell Road should take note
of the need to include and improve on landscaping
and communal areas. Opportunities arise
for the planting of larger indigenous trees
but adequate space must be left for them
to grow to maturity. |
| |
|
|
| PG 23. |
|
The allotments
should be preserved for present and future
generations. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Boundaries |
| |
|
|
| PG 24. |
|
New accesses
should be designed to minimize the loss
of boundary vegetation and achieve an appropriate
balance between highway safety and amenity. |
| |
|
|
| PG 25. |
|
Hedges and trees
are an essential part of the character of
Speen further enhancing the rural atmosphere.
These should be conserved and reinforced
through new planting in any new development
whether small or large. In addition, hedges
or a combination of hedges and low walls
or railings should be used in preference
to fences particularly on street frontages
and where the property boundary adjoins
open land |
| |
|
|
| PG 26. |
|
Any new development
on the edge of the village should conserve
or enhance the soft landscaped edge by the
provision of appropriate tree and hedgerow
planting. Hard edges of walls, fences or
other structures should be avoided. |
|